Click this link to optimize FeedbackTulsa for screen readers Skip to Content
Feedback Tulsa Logo Powered by PLANiTULSA

How well does the Berryhill Land Use Plan reflect the desires and visions of your Berryhill community?

7 registered responses


Check a box for every meeting to which you went

Meeting
Response Percent Response Count
Kickoff Meeting (April 2, 2018) 42.9% 3
Open House (September 27, 2018) 57.1% 4
I did not attend any meetings 28.6% 2

How well does the VISION STATEMENT capture your long-term desires for Berryhill? (1 = Not at All - 5 = Completely)

VISION STATEMENT
Response Percent Response Count
1 14.3% 1
2 14.3% 1
3 14.3% 1
4 57.1% 4

If you believe that the Vision Statement DOES NOT support Berryhill's vision for land use, please share your suggestions below

Answered
3
Skipped
4

How well do the following recommendations support Berryhill's vision for future land use? (1 = Not at All - 5 = Completely)

Recommendation 2.1
Response Percent Response Count
2 28.6% 2
3 42.9% 3
4 14.3% 1
5 14.3% 1
Recommendation 2.2
Response Percent Response Count
1 14.3% 1
2 14.3% 1
3 57.1% 4
4 14.3% 1

If you believe that either of the recommendations DO NOT support Berryhill's vision for land use, please share your suggestions below

Answered
3
Skipped
4

How well do the following recommendations support Berryhill's vision for future land use? (1 = Not at All - 5 = Completely)

Recommendation 3.1
Response Percent Response Count
2 28.6% 2
3 57.1% 4
5 14.3% 1
Recommendation 5.1
Response Percent Response Count
2 57.1% 4
3 14.3% 1
5 28.6% 2

If you believe that the recommendation DOES NOT support Berryhill's vision for land use, please share your suggestions below

Answered
4
Skipped
3

How well does the following recommendation support Berryhill's vision for future land use? (1 = Not at All - 5 = Completely)

Recommendation 10.2
Response Percent Response Count
1 42.9% 3
2 14.3% 1
3 14.3% 1
4 28.6% 2

If you believe that either of the recommendations DO NOT support Berryhill's vision for land use, please share your suggestions below

Answered
4
Skipped
3

How well does the following recommendation support Berryhill's vision for future land use? (1 = Not at All - 5 = Completely)

Recommendation 13.2
Response Percent Response Count
1 28.6% 2
2 14.3% 1
3 28.6% 2
4 14.3% 1
5 14.3% 1

If you believe that the priority DOES NOT support Berryhill's vision for land use, please share your suggestions below

Answered
3
Skipped
4
Johnnie Blaylock
October 24, 2018, 10:12 AM
  • Check a box for every meeting to which you went
    • Meeting - Kickoff Meeting (April 2, 2018), Open House (September 27, 2018)
  • How well does the VISION STATEMENT capture your long-term desires for Berryhill? (1 = Not at All - 5 = Completely)
    • VISION STATEMENT - 2
  • If you believe that the Vision Statement DOES NOT support Berryhill's vision for land use, please share your suggestions below

    Berryhill is, and has always been a residential community. We do not need or want any Spot zoning, businesses which were established without permission, and against the city's TMAPC/INCOGS recommendations.

    On 21st and 41st there has always been the ability to have commercial industrial zoning. To allow Industrial rezoning which is surrounded on three sides by residential lots, will totally be unethical and detrimental to the surrounding properties.
    There is already an ongoing illegal business being allowed by the city to continue to operate. He's been denied twice. Why? 57th is going to face the turnpike with residential lots. And now someone wants to put industrial zoning on one that is surrounded on all three sides by residential. Allowing that is spot zonig and unethical.

  • How well do the following recommendations support Berryhill's vision for future land use? (1 = Not at All - 5 = Completely)
    • Recommendation 2.1 - 2
    • Recommendation 2.2 - 1
  • If you believe that either of the recommendations DO NOT support Berryhill's vision for land use, please share your suggestions below

    21st and 41st already has mixed uses.
    57th west ave from 21st to 26th is all residential. Remove all nonconforming businesses. Only one is totally illegal and known by the city.

  • How well do the following recommendations support Berryhill's vision for future land use? (1 = Not at All - 5 = Completely)
    • Recommendation 3.1 - 3
    • Recommendation 5.1 - 5
  • If you believe that the recommendation DOES NOT support Berryhill's vision for land use, please share your suggestions below

    As long as there are no encroachments on residential homes.

  • How well does the following recommendation support Berryhill's vision for future land use? (1 = Not at All - 5 = Completely)
    • Recommendation 10.2 - 3
  • If you believe that either of the recommendations DO NOT support Berryhill's vision for land use, please share your suggestions below
    No response.
  • How well does the following recommendation support Berryhill's vision for future land use? (1 = Not at All - 5 = Completely)
    • Recommendation 13.2 - 3
  • If you believe that the priority DOES NOT support Berryhill's vision for land use, please share your suggestions below
    No response.
FeedbackTulsa is not a certified voting system or ballot box. As with any public comment process, participation in FeedbackTulsa is voluntary. The responses in this record are not necessarily representative of the whole population, nor do they reflect the opinions of any government agency or elected officials.

Your answers will NOT be saved

This is the form that was used to collect responses. It's here so you can try it and see how it worked when the topic was open.

The topic is now past deadline, and anything you enter into this form will not be saved.

Sign in and be yourself

Sign in and let others know who you are and what you think. You can sign in now or after you submit your response. You'll be able to read your response on this website and change it if you change your mind.

Read more about privacy >
* required

Be anonymous

We recommend against this option. Even though your response will be shared with staff, it won’t be shown on this public website so other community members won’t have the opportunity to see it.

Concerned about sharing your contact information with OpenGov?

Read more about privacy >

Read more about privacy >

FeedbackTulsa has two participation channels:

  • The Registered Channel: Sign in before or just after you submit your response. Either way, Open Town Hall will show your response on this website.
  • The Unregistered Channel: Don't sign in and remain anonymous. Open Town Hall will just share your response with Tulsa staff.

Note: The first time you sign in, you'll need to register (establish an account on FeedbackTulsa). Registration is free.

The City of Tulsa has contracted with Open Town Hall to monitor responses shown on this website.

  • To prevent any single user from dominating the forum, the City of Tulsa restricts the number of responses any one user can post on selected topics. Registration helps Open Town Hall enforce this restriction.
  • Users, staff and government leaders often want to know the neighborhood from which a response is posted. Open Town Hall uses registration to show the neighborhood next to each response (not the address).
  • If a user posts a response that does not meet the City of Tulsa guidelines for civility, Open Town Hall uses the user's email address to invite the user to resolve the issue.

Open Town Hall will get your contact information. The company is under contract with the City of Tulsa to hold it in strict confidence per their privacy policy.

  • Since you'll see your own response on FeedbackTulsa, you'll be able to confirm that your response was posted as you intended.
  • You'll be able to change and/or delete your response as long as the topic is open.

Yes. Sign out, then set your privacy preference to be "No - just show it without my name to staff". You won't need to register.

While no authentication procedure can perfectly detect every fraudulent registration, Open Town Hall is able to secure the registered channel against systematic fraud: cases where users submit enough statements with fraudulent registrations to sway the overall interpretation of the feedback.

Open Town Hall is unable to secure the unregistered channel against systematic fraud, because unregistered users are anonymous.

Neither the registered nor the unregistered channel represent a certified voting system or ballot box - and that caveat is footnoted on every page of feedback. Instead, both are additional channels for feedback to government.

Users can participate on the registered channel (by signing in) or on the unregistered channel (by remaining anonymous). The City of Tulsa offers both channels in order to broaden participation and maximize decision makers' insights.

The registered channel enables users to assure decision makers that their feedback comes from a real person in a specific neighborhood. It also enables users to participate in a public discussion on the website, as well as manage their own response after posting it.

The unregistered channel is for users who want to provide quick feedback without registering, and/or whose privacy concerns would prevent them from participating if required to register. Because many users with valuable insights will only share them anonymously, this channel gives decision makers the option to consider those insights in their deliberations.

OpenGovl is a non-partisan company whose mission is to broaden civic engagement and build public trust in government. The City of Tulsa has contracted with OpenGov to administer FeedbackTulsa.

Kickoff Meeting (April 2, 2018)
Open House (September 27, 2018)
I did not attend any meetings
Meeting
* required
Check out our guidelines for civility

Fields marked with * are required

< Intro  
  Page 1 of 6